dudo02 napísal: A v kolkych z nich vybuchol boeing?

hughito napísal:Tu ide o to, že aj v tých správach sa píše, že mrakodrapy spadli v dôsledku ohňa..., nie v dôsledku nárazu lietadiel.

2.2 Building Response
WTC 1 and WTC 2 each experienced a similar, though not identical, series of loading events. In
essence, each tower was subjected to three separate, but related events. The sequence of these events was
the same for the two buildings, although the timing was not. In each case, the first loading event was a
Boeing 767-200ER series commercial aircraft hitting the building, together with a fireball resulting from
immediate rapid ignition of a portion of the fuel on board the aircraft. Boeing 767-200ER aircraft have a
maximum rated takeoff weight of 395,000 pounds, a wingspan of 156 feet 1 inch, and a rated cruise
speed of 530 miles per hour. The aircraft is capable of carrying up to 23,980 gallons of fuel, and it is
estimated that, at the time of impact, each aircraft had approximately 10,000 gallons of unused fuel on
board (compiled from Government sources).
In each case, the aircraft impacts resulted in severe structural damage, including some localized partial
collapse, but did not result in the initiation of global collapse. In fact, WTC 1 remained standing for a
period of approximately 1 hour and 43 minutes, following the initial impact; WTC 2 remained standing for
approximately 56 minutes following impact. The second event was the simultaneous ignition and growth of
fires over large floor areas on several levels of the buildings. The fires heated the structural systems and, over
a period of time, resulted in additional stressing of the damaged structure, as well as sufficient additional
damage and strength loss to initiate the third event, a progressive sequence of failures that culminated in
total collapse of both structures.

Akurát, že aj samotné oficiálne zdroje priznali vo svojich analýzach, že samotný náraz lietadla nemal žiaden vplyv na pád.

hughito napísal:Úplne primárne je to, že za dôsledok pádu môže podľa analýz požiar, vysoká teplota a následné deformácie.

Škoda, že si tu bolduješ len to, čo sa ti hodí. Ja som od začiatku tvrdil len toto: In each case, the aircraft impacts resulted in severe structural damage, including some localized partial collapse, but did not result in the initiation of global collapse.

Možno som zvolil pre teba zlé slová, keď som napísal: Myslel som to tak, resp. som citoval len to, čo hovoril ten odborník vo videu: samotný náraz nehral tú rolu, pre ktorú budovy spadli, konieckoncov, tie budovy na takýto náraz aj boli konštruované, teda aspoň teoreticky.

Dôležitý je ten second event, ktorý vraj zapríčinil pád budov.

K wc7 sa môžme presunúť aj hneď, nesnaž sa odbočiť, aj keď viem, že je to určite nepríjemná záležitosť pre tých, ktorí obhajujú oficiálnu verziu.

Nie,nie-bavime sa o dvojickach a ci moze naraz lietadiel sposobit pad mrakodrapov-toto je podstata.Ziadne WTC7 teraz nerozoberaj-prave ty sa snazis odbocit od temy!

In each case, the aircraft impacts resulted in severe structural damage, including some localized partial
collapse, but did not result in the initiation of global collapse. In fact, WTC 1 remained standing for a
period of approximately 1 hour and 43 minutes, following the initial impact; WTC 2 remained standing for
approximately 56 minutes following impact.

Co si myslis teda ty-mohla budova padnut podla scenara ktory je opisany v sprave.Cize Naraz,vybuch,poziar...Poprosim ANO,aleno NIE.

eMPiko napísal:Len tak informacne, mas nejako podlozene ze dvojicky boli stavane proti narazu lietadla? Dvojicky mali velmi specificku strukturu totizto. Na to ake to boli vysoke mrakodrapy mali velmi tenke jadro, a velka cast nosnosti bola na tom zavesenom vonkajsom rame. To mi tak intuitivne nepride ako konstrukcia proti narazu lietadla. Mozno nejake mensie, ale ten boeing prakticky prerazil tu budovu.