Osmijanko napísal:jackob
Čo poniektorí robia so svojím rozumom? Kam ho dali? Prečo im kur*a nefunguje?????????????????

In a 2011 peer-reviewed paper, U.S. Geologic Survey scientist Terry Gerlach summarized five previous estimates of global volcanic carbon dioxide emission rates that had been published between 1991 and 1998. Those estimates incorporated studies reaching back to the 1970s, and they were based on a wide variety of measurements, such as direct sampling and satellite remote sensing. The global estimates fell within a range of about 0.3 ± 0.15 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide per year, implying that human carbon dioxide emissions were more than 90 times greater than global volcanic carbon dioxide emissions.

In 2013, another group of scientists—Michael Burton, Georgina Sawyer, and Domenico Granieri—published an updated estimate using more data on carbon dioxide emissions from subsurface magma that had become available in the years since the last global estimate. While acknowledging a large range of variability in the estimates, the authors concluded that the best overall estimate was about 0.6 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide per year.

While higher than Gerlach's estimate, the figure is still just a fraction of carbon dioxide output from human activities. Gerlach remarked via email, “Taken at face value, their result implies that anthropogenic CO2 exceeds global volcanic CO2 by at least a factor of 60 times.”

Occasionally, eruptions are powerful enough to release carbon dioxide at a rate that matches or even exceeds the global rate of human emissions for a few hours. For example, Gerlach estimated that the eruptions of Mount St. Helens (1980) and Pinatubo (1991) both released carbon dioxide on a scale similar to human output for about nine hours. Human emissions of carbon dioxide continue day after day, month after month, year after year.

Osmijanko napísal:jackob
Veda stále nemá ani len jasne rozhodnuté, či je to naozaj CO2, čo spôsobuje otepľovanie. A taká sopka dokáže do atmosféry vychŕliť podstatne viac CO2.(akurát my sme výbuch sopky už dlho nezažili.) https://refresher.sk/26624-Vybuch-sopky ... ch-ludstva

Riadna erupcia bola posledná v roku 1883 a tú ziaľ rozne tabuľky neukazujú. Schválne? Alebo o čo ide. Keďže sa jednalo o neporovnateľne vačší výbuch, ako všetky po ňom, tak je len logické, ze aj vychŕlenie CO2 bolo pordstane vyššie...
Čo poniektorí robia so svojím rozumom? Kam ho dali? Prečo im kur*a nefunguje?????????????????

Osmijanko napísal:Chytiš sa prvej hovadiny, ktorú nájdeš a korešponduje s tvojím ideologickým postojom, potom je len logické, že čerpáš hovadiny.

Osmijanko napísal:my sme výbuch sopky už dlho nezažili

The Mount Pinatubo eruption emitted 42 million tonnes of CO2 (Gerlach et al 1996). Compare this to human emissions in 1991: 23 billion tonnes of CO2 (CDIAC). The strongest eruption over the last half-century amounted to 0.2% of human CO2 emissions in that year.

Osmijanko napísal:gogo, Sklen.efekt ako príčina ( alebo jedna z príčin) glob. oteplovania . Tym sa myslelo tá nepotvrdená teória, ze sposobuje gl. otepl. Sklen. efekt je inak prirodzeny jav samozrejme .

Osmijanko napísal:Sklenikovy efekt ani nebol poriadne dokazany .

Osmijanko napísal:Takze CO2 evidentne nebude to, čo nám škodí, práve naopak. Škodí nám niečo iné

Osmijanko napísal:Čo poniektorí robia so svojím rozumom? Kam ho dali? Prečo im kur*a nefunguje?????????????????

Je Gréta výsledkom šikovného PR? Skutočne otepľujeme Zem my? Prečo nepanuje zhoda o otepľovaní?

Pozvanie prijali klímaskeptik Vítězslav Kremlík, redaktorka Eva Frantová a klimatológ Jozef Pecho.