http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/11/30/ ... p_to_3_ghz


Doporucujem, aby ste si skor nez nieco napisete pozorne prestudovali cely clanok na TomsHard - dakujem (predideme tak zbytocnym flamom)

Novy 680A chipset

Technically, the Quad FX platform could be powered by any timely chipset on the market, but AMD and Nvidia had to come up with something substantially improved. Well, here it is: the nForce 680a. It equals the nForce 570 SLI in terms of its northbridge, but nForce 680a uses two of these to provide as many as four x16 PCI Express slots, two powered with 16 lanes, two more running eight lanes, and tons of interfaces. In any case, this provides more than enough bandwidth for a Quad SLI powerhouse and even additional add-on cards. Each of these northbridges is attached to the primary CPU socket via a dedicated X16 HyperTransport link.

par obrazkov celej zostavy http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/11/30/ ... nce_system

Mam z toho zmiesane pocity, cele sa mi to zda dost hybridne... a vsetko nasvedcuje tomu ze sa este dlho nedockame 64nm AMD, na druhej strane je ale obdivuhodne co amd dokaze z 90nm - minimalne, sa priblizuje Kensfieldu QX6700, niekde mu dokonca dava na frak, ktory je uz robeny novym vyrobnym procesom...

Nazaver
ZA a PROTI

Pro AMD Quad FX:

* Very sophisticated, state-of-the art 32/64-bit uber-enthusiast platform
* Huge bandwidth between processor(s) and northbridges
* Dedicated main memory for each processor
* Works with mainstream DDR2-800 memory
* Dual-processor system very likely to scale better under Windows Vista Ultimate Edition
* Entry-level Athlon 64 FX-70 twin-processor kits available at $599
* Dual-socket platform allows for future upgrade to quad core processors (eight cores per system)


Contra AMD Quad FX:

* Very high power requirements due to two processors
* High cooling requirements (air conditioning?)
* Power draw of 500+ W requires at least a 750 W power supply
* Very high platform costs (four memory modules and a $400+ motherboard)
* Platform benefits not noticeable with most of today's applications
* Virtually no overclocking margins for the FX-74 top model
* Only a single motherboard available (Asus); likely not available in retail, but via system integrators

dalsi z "prezentacnych" procesorov, ktory si ani sebebohatsi clovek nedovoli. A myslim, ze to nebude stacit ani na terajsi Kentsfield.

t0m4s3 napísal:dalsi z "prezentacnych" procesorov, ktory si ani sebebohatsi clovek nedovoli. A myslim, ze to nebude stacit ani na terajsi Kentsfield.

no ono su to procesory vlastne dva .. a toto riesenie nestoji viac ako stvorjadro Intelu

Mam z toho zmiesane pocity, cele sa mi to zda dost hybridne... a vsetko nasvedcuje tomu ze sa este dlho nedockame 64nm AMD, na druhej strane je ale obdivuhodne co amd dokaze z 90nm - minimalne, sa priblizuje Kensfieldu QX6700, niekde mu dokonca dava na frak, ktory je uz robeny novym vyrobnym procesom...

vykon procesora predsa priamo nezavisi na vyrobnom procese ... a AMD uz zacala s vyrobou 65nm procesorov .. myslim ze sa uz predavaju

Neviem o tom ze by sa predavali procesory urcene pre desktop od AMD s 65nm....
Co sa vyrobneho procesu tyka sice vykon neovplyvnuje priamo, ale je velmi dolezitym faktorom pri vykone procesoru a dalsich jeho vlastnosti ako je spotreba, teplota, frekvencia atd.

Ale uz AMD oficialne uviedlo 65nm procaky do predaja pokial sa nemylim. A aj tak to moc nepomoze, nebudeme si klamat predsa. Par MHz navyse ho nezachrani pred silou C2D, leda tak nadalej konkurovat nizkou cenou

mystique napísal:Neviem o tom ze by sa predavali procesory urcene pre desktop od AMD s 65nm....
Co sa vyrobneho procesu tyka sice vykon neovplyvnuje priamo, ale je velmi dolezitym faktorom pri vykone procesoru a dalsich jeho vlastnosti ako je spotreba, teplota, frekvencia atd.

To, ze ty o tom nevies predsa vobec nic neznamena. Pretoze nevies o daleko viac veciach http://www.cdr.cz/a/19614 . Uz ti to raz gwixt napisal, ze samotny vyrobny proces nema s vykonom nic spolocne.