slay napísal:ved doniesli kua aj vzorky ktore skumali nie len oni /// a taka absurdita by sa uz davno prevalila... zase nebudme paranoidny...

The Earth's atmosphere limits the belts' particles to regions above 200–1,000 km,[2] while the belts do not extend past 7 Earth radii

Missions beyond low earth orbit leave the protection of the geomagnetic field, and transit the Van Allen belts. Thus they may need to be shielded against exposure to cosmic rays, Van Allen radiation, or solar flares. The region between two to three earth radii lies between the two radiation belts and is sometimes referred to as the "safe zone"

1. The astronauts could not have survived the trip because of exposure to radiation from the Van Allen radiation belt and galactic ambient radiation (see radiation poisoning). Some hoax theorists have suggested that Starfish Prime (high altitude nuclear testing in 1962) was a failed attempt to disrupt the Van Allen belts.
The Moon is ten times higher than the Van Allen radiation belts. The spacecraft moved through the belts in just 30 minutes, and the astronauts were protected from the ionizing radiation by the aluminium hulls of the spacecraft. In addition, the orbital transfer trajectory from the Earth to the Moon through the belts was selected to minimize radiation exposure. Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too dangerous for the Apollo missions. Plait cited an average dose of less than 1 rem, which is equivalent to the ambient radiation received by living at sea level for three years.[54], pp. 160–162 The spacecraft passed through the intense inner belt in a matter of minutes and the low-energy outer belt in about an hour and a half. The astronauts were mostly shielded from the radiation by the spacecraft. The total radiation received on the trip was about the same as allowed for workers in the nuclear energy field for a year.[63]
The radiation is actually evidence that the astronauts went to the Moon. Irene Schneider reports that thirty-three of the thirty-six Apollo astronauts involved in the nine Apollo missions to leave Earth orbit have developed early stage cataracts that have been shown to be caused by radiation exposure to cosmic rays during their trip.[64] However, only twenty-four astronauts left earth orbit. At least thirty-nine former astronauts have developed cataracts. Thirty-six of those were involved in high-radiation missions such as the Apollo lunar missions.[65]

2. Film in the cameras would have been fogged by this radiation.
The film was kept in metal containers that prevented radiation from fogging the film's emulsion.[54], pp. 162–163 In addition, film carried by unmanned lunar probes such as the Lunar Orbiter and Luna 3 (which used on-board film development processes) was not fogged.

3. The Moon's surface during the daytime is so hot that camera film would have melted.
There is no atmosphere to efficiently couple lunar surface heat to devices such as cameras not in direct contact with it. In a vacuum, only radiation remains as a heat transfer mechanism. The physics of radiative heat transfer are thoroughly understood, and the proper use of passive optical coatings and paints was adequate to control the temperature of the film within the cameras; lunar module temperatures were controlled with similar coatings that gave it its gold color. Also, while the Moon's surface does get very hot at lunar noon, every Apollo landing was made shortly after lunar sunrise at the landing site. During the longer stays, the astronauts did notice increased cooling loads on their spacesuits as the sun continued to rise and the surface temperature increased, but the effect was easily countered by the passive and active cooling systems.[54], pp. 165–67 The film was not in direct sunlight, so it wasn't overheated.[66]
Note: all of the lunar landings occurred during the lunar daytime. The Moon's day is approximately 29½ days long, and as a consequence a single lunar day (dawn to dusk) lasts nearly fifteen days. As such there was no sunrise or sunset while the astronauts were on the surface. Most lunar missions occurred during the first few earth days of the lunar day.

4. The Apollo 16 crew should not have survived a big solar flare firing out when they were on their way to the Moon. "They should have been fried."
No large solar flare occurred during the flight of Apollo 16. There were large solar flares in August 1972, after Apollo 16 returned to Earth and before the flight of Apollo 17

slay napísal: Len aby som spravne chapal, krija, snazis sa dokazat ze vzdialit sa od zeme do kozmu na vacsiu vzdialenost ako tych 400 ci 800 km je samo o sebe smrtelne kvoli castiaciam ktore ti bez ochrany zemskeho magnetickeho pola znicia DNA? Len sa to snazim zjednodusit a spravit si abstrakt z toho cosi prezentoval.. lebo neviem ci ta spravne chapem.

celkova hrubka pola, ktore moze byt potencionalne nebezpecne pre astronautov je maximalne :38 268

The spacecraft moved through the belts in just 30 minutes, and the astronauts were protected from the ionizing radiation by the aluminium hulls of the spacecraft.

spirki napísal:krija - smrť Lajka dokazuje akurát to, že psi nedokážu prežiť stres a teplotu nad 40°C.

axXis napísal:Krija:
aj keby isiel raketoplan tak rychlo ako udavas Ty stale by mu to trval prelet cez potencionalne nebezpecne pole iba hodinu cim by ziskali davku o hodnote 2rem (co je 50krat menej ako uvadzas Ty) a bez problemov by prezili

axXis napísal:btw. nenapadlo Ta, ze keby bol tento let naozaj sfalsovany a bola moznost ho lahko a okamzite vyvratit tak by sa toho sovietsky zvaz okamzite neujal aby nekonpromitoval svojho najvacsieho oponenta pocas studenej vojny? ked bol niekto schopny vymysliet americkeho chrobaka tak neverim tomu, ze tohto by sa nechytil

beardie napísal:nenapadlo vas, ze keby to bol odrb, tak tam nejdu 7-krat?

čísla řeknou víc:

Marshallův plán stál $12.7 mld. ($115.3 mld. po započtení inflace)
Vesmírné závody stály $36.4 mld. ($237 mld. s inflací)
Korejská válka stála $54 mld. ($454 mld. s inflací)
New Deal stál $32 mld. (odhad; $500 mld. s inflací)
Invaze do Iráku stála $551 mld. ($597 mld. s inflací)
Vietnamská válka stála $111 mld. ($698 mld. s inflací)
-------Amanda Shaw čísla z blogu First Things--------

Obamův protikrizový plán:1,1 bilionu =1100 mld.

- projekt Apollo stál asi 24 mld ( tehdejší měny), ale vyčíslili, že do deseti let se na aplikacích vynálezů a objevů Apolla ušetřilo na 70 mld

- Pozdější ekonomické rozbory ale ukázaly, že projekt Apollo byl velmi rentabilní: z každého investovaného dolaru se vrátilo třináct

- je nutno podotknout, že projekt Apollo také stál neuvěřitelných 24 miliard (tehdejších) dolarů, ale náklady se dnes asi 15× vrátily!

- čísla se trochu liší z různých zdrojů ale - sedí, jen Vietnam stál 4x tolik co Apollo...

...takže zásadní otázky asi zní jinak než jestli tam byli nebo ne...

- takže ako spísal piko "v USA nie je Hollywood, celé USA je Hollywood..."

axXis napísal:Krija:
aj keby isiel raketoplan tak rychlo ako udavas Ty stale by mu to trval prelet cez potencionalne nebezpecne pole iba hodinu cim by ziskali davku o hodnote 2rem (co je 50krat menej ako uvadzas Ty) a bez problemov by prezili