hughito napísal:Celé je to postavené na zovšeobecnení, že Židia si vytvorili nejakú evolučnú stratégiu prežitia, ktorú "nasleduje" každý Žid a spočíva to v rozkladnom pôsobení voči "bielym" atď.
"
Každý žid" je len tvoj
straw man argument a lacný spôsob ako ignorovať nepohodlné fakty.
hughito napísal:Židia však už majú dávno svoj štát a stále mi uchádza tá logika, že čo by mali z toho, keby rozložili "západný svet bielych." Veď pomerne početné skupiny Arabi by ich zožrali. Práve ten "západný svet bielych" je pre nich istou garanciou.
Západ sa dnes môžu javiť ako útočisko židov, ale z historického hľadiska predstavujú tradičné európske ("Biele") krajiny pre židovstvo potencionálnu hrozbu .. z toho pramení záujem na podkopaní ich základov - a vytvorení pre nich "bezpečnejšej spoločnosti". Ale to všetko je zdokumentované zo židovských zdrojov práve v knihách od tohto a iných autorov. Možno keby si to chcel naozaj pochopiť, tak si to aj prečítaš.
A nie, "
každý žid" takto nerozmýšľa - tu je jeden príklad
https://twitter.com/ReactionaryJew (keď to potrebuješ zdôrazňovať) - tento nepodstatný fakt, ale nemení nič na tom, čo ideologicky predstavuje hlavný prúd - či už je to z nášho pohľadu pre nich v konečnom dôsledku prospešné alebo nie.
hughito napísal:Čiže je to pekná konšpirácia v štýle "jews everyhere," ich vplyv je takmer všade, všetko riadia a ťahajú nitkami a "zbytok" sú len hlúpi gójovia, ktorí nadšene ich agendu preberajú.
Tento primitívny "záver" vychádzajúci z dvojvetovej "analýzy" len vypovedá o tvojej intelektuálnej nečestnosti a dogmatickom myslení.
Najskôr ti je ťažké prijať fakt, že rôzne, hlavne moderné ľavicové hnutia, tu práve slúžia ako prostriedok na útok proti tradičným spoločnostiam na
Západe.
MacDonaldova akademická reputácia tiež nestojí za veľa, ale to ani nemá zmysel písať, lebo však "Židia.."
Jeho práce na túto tému, hlavne "Kultúra kritiky", sú v súčasnom (silne ľavicovom) akademickom prostredí zámerne ignorované (nie vyvracané) .. Jedna z mála, ak nie jediná
recenzia, ktorá vyšla, je pozitívna:
- As I hope has been made clear, MacDonald presents his readers with a broad and detailed scholarship that can usually be challenged only through matching his assiduous attention to many specialist literatures. I have made no attempt here to critique his theories beyond noting their mainstream documentation, but some of his most visible opponents have done even less, while adding personal and very public attacks to their criticisms. Unfortunately for those who rebel at his empirical claims, these are mostly not MacDonald's assertions but the expert opinions of leaders in various scholarly and scientific fields. Certainly, whether his theories are ultimately viable or not, MacDonald is a scholar of considerable analytical power and scope.
Several major aspects are distinctive to MacDonald's analysis. His is the first historical-sociological application of Boyd and Richerson's (1985) theory of cultural group strategy, which he elaborates into evolutionary group strategy theory (1st volume). He offers an evolutionary interpretation of Social Identity Theory (2nd volume). I suspect both are destined to become influential. But for me what is most impressive, and this is the achievement of Culture of Critique, MacDonald has shown theoretical and methodological pathways linking the micro-level analysis of human behaviour with the macro-level dynamics of contemporary culture. He has done so on a narrow front, in a monumental case study of social relations affecting one people's struggle to survive and prosper, but that is a big start.
- Frank Salter, Max Planck Institute, Andechs, Germany
Samozrejme ani "akademická reputácia" Franka Saltera ti nemusí vyhovovať, keďže pravdepodobne nie je "ľavičiar".
hughito napísal:Zaujímavé je, že existujú už x-krát spomínaní aj židovskí akademici, ktorí sú veľmi kritickí napr. voči Izraelu, ale vôbec nepreberajú niektoré tieto predstavy.
Kritický voči Izraelu (do istej miery) je aj George Soros, to neznamená, že budú kritickí k úlohe židov v intelektuálnych hnutiach na
Západe - čiže k sebe samým. Dobre vieš, že títo židovskí akademici sú ideologicky ľavicovo vyhranení a z toho plynie aj ich prípadná kritika Izraelu..
Tu je, v rámci témy, možno trochu "politicky-ľavicovo nekorektný" pohľad jedného z nich,
- Can you give some insight on how the labor movement could rebuild in the United States?
NOAM CHOMSKY: Well, it’s been done before. Each time labor has been attacked—and as I said, in the 1920s the labor movement was practically destroyed—popular efforts were able to reconstitute it. That can happen again. It’s not going to be easy. There are institutional barriers, ideological barriers, cultural barriers. One big problem is that the white working class has been pretty much abandoned by the political system. The Democrats don’t even try to organize them anymore. The Republicans claim to do it; they get most of the vote, but they do it on non-economic issues, on non-labor issues. They often try to mobilize them on the grounds of issues steeped in racism and sexism and so on, and here the liberal policies of the 1960s had a harmful effect because of some of the ways in which they were carried out. There are some pretty good studies of this. Take busing to integrate schools. In principle, it made some sense, if you wanted to try to overcome segregated schools. Obviously, it didn’t work. Schools are probably more segregated now for all kinds of reasons, but the way it was originally done undermined class solidarity.
For example, in Boston there was a program for integrating the schools through busing, but the way it worked was restricted to urban Boston, downtown Boston. So black kids were sent to the Irish neighborhoods and conversely, but the suburbs were left out. The suburbs are more affluent, professional and so on, so they were kind of out of it. Well, what happens when you send black kids into an Irish neighborhood? What happens when some Irish telephone linemen who have worked all their lives finally got enough money to buy small houses in a neighborhood where they want to send their kids to the local school and cheer for the local football team and have a community, and so on? All of a sudden, some of their kids are being sent out, and black kids are coming in. How do you think at least some of these guys will feel? At least some end up being racists. The suburbs are out of it, so they can cluck their tongues about how racist everyone is elsewhere, and that kind of pattern was carried out all over the country.
