PC do 90 000 sk
este k asusu striker extreme
Kód: Vybrať všetko
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/2006/11/23/asus_striker_extreme_preview/7.htmlThe Asus Striker Extreme clearly has a lot of potential and it will be interesting to see how things develop over the next few weeks in the run up to retail availability. We can't wait to sit down and test a retail board with a final BIOS, because there is masses of potential for this board to be one of the best boards out there once it's released.
No skusime takto, kedze ti nebude luto tych penazi...
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 2.4GHz BOX 775 4MB dual
XMS2 Corsair DOMINATOR 9136 C5D DDR2 2x1024 (5-5-5-15) 1142Mhz
Asus Striker Extreme P5N32-E SLI
2 x WD Raptor 74 GB, 1.5 Gb/s, 8 MB Cache, 10,000 RPM Raid 0
2 x SEAGATE 400GB 7200 SATA2 8M ST3400833AS Raid 0
XFX 8800GTX DDR3
Tagan 800W
-
misokgb
King
- Príspevky: 1756
- Registrovaný: 31 aug 2005, 20:28
- Bydlisko: TWiN SPARK FOREVER
- Kontaktovať používateľa:
LoL, 551Watt s tym by som utiahol dve taketo zostavy pomaly... (neberte doslova...)
Uz zabudnite na teple kalkulacky po nete, ale pozrite si realne cisla...
Napr.:
Zostava:
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
NVIDIA nForce 650i SLI based motherboard
2x1GB PC2-6400
NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTX
Western Digital Raptor 150
Idle mala zostava 230Watt a v zatazi 320 Watt, takze ziadne pol kilowattove zataze sa nekonaju, a k tomu si zober, ze tu je 4jadrovy procak, a nie dvojjadrovy...
Uz zabudnite na teple kalkulacky po nete, ale pozrite si realne cisla...
Napr.:
Zostava:
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
NVIDIA nForce 650i SLI based motherboard
2x1GB PC2-6400
NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTX
Western Digital Raptor 150
Idle mala zostava 230Watt a v zatazi 320 Watt, takze ziadne pol kilowattove zataze sa nekonaju, a k tomu si zober, ze tu je 4jadrovy procak, a nie dvojjadrovy...
-
misokgb
King
- Príspevky: 1756
- Registrovaný: 31 aug 2005, 20:28
- Bydlisko: TWiN SPARK FOREVER
- Kontaktovať používateľa:
Testovali to na 3Dmarku 2006, ktory vytazi vsetky styri jadra a grafiku na plny kkt. Nevravim, ze je to max. co mozu z toho vymackat, ale keby sa nahodou menili apliakacie, ktore by to vedeli viac vyuzit, viac nez cca 30Watt v zatazi navrch tam urcite nebude, to da zdravy rozum predsa. To aby som setril podla tvojej teorie na elektrinu a nie na komp, nie? 
Prosimta to mas skade, vsak s 520W zdrojom qx6700 odmieta bootnut
In their QX6700 test instructions Intel is also strongly recommending using only an ATX 2.2 PSU that comes with a 8-pin “EPS” 12-volt connector, and not using an PSU with a 4-pin to 8-pin adaptor. We tried initially an older (520 Watt) ATX 2.1 Watt PSU with a 4-pin 12 volt connector and indeed found that the QX6700 system would not even power up. Changing to a 700 Watt ATX 2.2 PSU with a 12 volt EPS connector solved this problem. The system booted up, Windows XP properly recognized and utilized the 4 cores, and was running all benchmarks without any problem. It is our recommendation not to assume that every “Core 2 Duo” capable board automatically runs also a “Core 2 Quad” and to make sure to have an ATX 2.2 PSU at hand that comes with an 8-pin 12 volt connector.
Under full load with all 4 cores 100% utilized the QX6700 was consuming 270 Watt and running at 69C with the provided heatsink.
Co sa 3d marku 06 tyka - Cpu je na max vytazene pri CPu teste, tam grafika odpociva (takmer) a opacne je to zasa pri 3d testoch kde pocita grafika a poti sa aj cpu ale 6700 rozhodne nie (jedno jadro)
Pokial tu nebude OS ktory dokaze efektivne vyuzivat 4 jadra naraz a 3d aplikacia urobena v DX 10 nemozes toto cislo povazovat za maximalnu zataz...
In their QX6700 test instructions Intel is also strongly recommending using only an ATX 2.2 PSU that comes with a 8-pin “EPS” 12-volt connector, and not using an PSU with a 4-pin to 8-pin adaptor. We tried initially an older (520 Watt) ATX 2.1 Watt PSU with a 4-pin 12 volt connector and indeed found that the QX6700 system would not even power up. Changing to a 700 Watt ATX 2.2 PSU with a 12 volt EPS connector solved this problem. The system booted up, Windows XP properly recognized and utilized the 4 cores, and was running all benchmarks without any problem. It is our recommendation not to assume that every “Core 2 Duo” capable board automatically runs also a “Core 2 Quad” and to make sure to have an ATX 2.2 PSU at hand that comes with an 8-pin 12 volt connector.
Under full load with all 4 cores 100% utilized the QX6700 was consuming 270 Watt and running at 69C with the provided heatsink.
Co sa 3d marku 06 tyka - Cpu je na max vytazene pri CPu teste, tam grafika odpociva (takmer) a opacne je to zasa pri 3d testoch kde pocita grafika a poti sa aj cpu ale 6700 rozhodne nie (jedno jadro)
Pokial tu nebude OS ktory dokaze efektivne vyuzivat 4 jadra naraz a 3d aplikacia urobena v DX 10 nemozes toto cislo povazovat za maximalnu zataz...
-
misokgb
King
- Príspevky: 1756
- Registrovaný: 31 aug 2005, 20:28
- Bydlisko: TWiN SPARK FOREVER
- Kontaktovať používateľa:
Original Intel Web:
Pricing and Availability (USD)
Processor Price
Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355 2.66GHz 1333MHz 8MB 120W $1172
Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E5345 2.33GHz 1333MHz 8MB 80W $851
Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E5320 1.86GHz 1066MHz 8MB 80W $690
Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E5310 1.60GHz 1066MHz 8MB 80W $455
Intel Core 2 Extreme quad-core processor QX6700
2.66GHz 1066MHz 8MB 130W $999
A myslim, ze je to jasne, kedze E6600 zere 65Watt, 2x65=130Watt. Kedze 2xE6700 = QX6700
Pricing and Availability (USD)
Processor Price
Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor X5355 2.66GHz 1333MHz 8MB 120W $1172
Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E5345 2.33GHz 1333MHz 8MB 80W $851
Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E5320 1.86GHz 1066MHz 8MB 80W $690
Quad-Core Intel Xeon processor E5310 1.60GHz 1066MHz 8MB 80W $455
Intel Core 2 Extreme quad-core processor QX6700
2.66GHz 1066MHz 8MB 130W $999
A myslim, ze je to jasne, kedze E6600 zere 65Watt, 2x65=130Watt. Kedze 2xE6700 = QX6700